공지사항

motor vehicle claim motor vehicle settlement Litigation

A lawsuit is required when liability is contested. The defendant has the right to respond to the complaint.

New York follows pure comparative fault rules, which means that in the event that a jury finds that you are responsible for causing a crash the damages awarded will be reduced by the percentage of negligence. There is a slight exception to this rule: CPLR SS 1602 excludes owners of vehicles hired or leased by minors.

Duty of Care

In a case of negligence the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed the duty of care toward them. This duty is owed to everyone, but people who operate a vehicle owe an even greater obligation to other drivers in their field. This includes not causing accidents in motor vehicle case vehicles.

In courtrooms, the standards of care are determined by comparing an individual's actions with what a normal person would do in similar situations. In the case of medical malpractice expert witnesses are typically required. Experts with a higher level of expertise in a particular field can also be held to an higher standard of care than other individuals in similar situations.

A breach of a person's duty of care can cause harm to the victim or their property. The victim then has to prove that the defendant acted in breach of their obligation and caused the damage or damage they sustained. Causation is an important part of any negligence claim. It involves proving the primary and secondary causes of the injuries and damages.

If someone is driving through the stop sign, they are likely to be struck by a vehicle. If their car is damaged they will be responsible for repairs. The real cause of the crash could be a fracture in the brick that leads to an infection.

Breach of Duty

A breach of duty by the defendant is the second aspect of negligence that has to be proven to win compensation in a personal injury case. A breach of duty occurs when the actions of a party who is at fault fall short of what an average person would do in similar circumstances.

For instance, a physician has a variety of professional obligations to his patients stemming from laws of the state and licensing boards. Drivers have a duty to take care of other drivers and pedestrians, and to follow traffic laws. If a driver violates this obligation and causes an accident is responsible for the victim's injuries.

A lawyer can rely on the "reasonable person" standard to establish the existence of a duty of care and then demonstrate that the defendant failed to comply with the standard in his actions. It is a question of fact that the jury has to decide if the defendant fulfilled the standard or not.

The plaintiff must also demonstrate that the defendant's negligence was the sole cause of the plaintiff's injuries. It can be more difficult to prove this than a breach of duty. For example the defendant could have crossed a red light, but his or her action wasn't the proximate cause of your bike crash. Causation is often contested in case of a crash by the defendants.

Causation

In motor vehicle law vehicle cases, the plaintiff has to establish a causal link between the defendant's breach of duty and his or her injuries. For instance, if a plaintiff sustained a neck injury from an accident that involved rear-ends and their lawyer will argue that the collision was the cause of the injury. Other factors that are needed to produce the collision, such as being in a stationary vehicle are not culpable and do not affect the jury's decision of liability.

It may be harder to establish a causal relationship between an act of negligence and the psychological issues of the plaintiff. It could be that the plaintiff has had a difficult past, has a bad relationship with their parents, or has been a user of drugs or alcohol.

If you have been in an accident that is serious to your vehicle it is essential to speak with an experienced attorney. The attorneys at Arnold & Clifford, LLP, have extensive experience in representing clients in personal injury as well as commercial and business litigation, and motor vehicle attorney vehicle crash cases. Our lawyers have developed relationships with independent physicians with a variety of specialties including expert witnesses in accident reconstruction and computer simulations as well with private investigators.

Damages

In motor vehicle litigation, a plaintiff can seek both economic and noneconomic damages. The first type of damages covers all costs that are easily added together and calculated as a total, for example, medical treatments as well as lost wages, repairs to property, and even financial loss, for instance loss of earning capacity.

New York law also recognizes the right to seek non-economic damages like pain and suffering as well as loss of enjoyment of life which cannot be reduced to a monetary amount. However, these damages must be established to exist through extensive evidence, such as deposition testimony of the plaintiff's close friends and family members medical records, deposition testimony, and other expert witness testimony.

In cases involving multiple defendants, Courts will often use rules of comparative negligence to determine how much of the total damages awarded should be divided between them. The jury must determine the degree of fault each defendant had for the accident and motor vehicle litigation to then divide the total damages awarded by that percentage of fault. New York law however, does not allow for this. 1602 exempts owners of vehicles from the rule of comparative negligence in cases where injuries are sustained by drivers of cars or trucks. The resulting analysis of whether the presumption of permissive use applies is not straightforward, and typically only a clear showing that the owner has explicitly denied permission to operate the vehicle will overcome it.