공지사항

How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Bringing a medical malpractice suit against a hospital or doctor requires evidence that the defendant has violated his or her duty to patients. This evidence can include hospital and medical records.

Our lawyers have years of expertise in obtaining depositions that are successful. They could be doctors or other medical professionals working in private practice, or even staff members at a hospital or clinic.

Negligence

When a patient goes to a doctor or hospital professional is entitled to certain standards of medical treatment. Unfortunately the standards aren't always met, or even violated. The results of this breach could be devastating.

When someone suffers injury or death because of a doctor's negligence, they can file a lawsuit against the medical professional. To have a valid case the patient who has been injured must prove four legal elements including breach of duty and causation and damages.

Malpractice is defined as an act by a doctor that is outside the accepted norms of the medical community and causes harm to patients. It is a part of tort law that addresses civil wrongs, not criminal offenses or contractual obligations.

Medical negligence differs from normal negligence because the victim must prove that the doctor knew or should have known that their actions could cause harm in order to claim malpractice compensation, but normal negligence is not required. A surgeon who accidentally cuts or nicks one of the nerves or veins during surgery is guilty of negligence but not negligence. This is because the surgeon did not intend to harm anyone.

In a medical malpractice case, the defendant has an obligation to treat the patient in accordance with the standards of care that a reasonably prudent healthcare professional with the same expertise and training in similar circumstances would offer. The breach of this obligation is a crucial aspect since it shows that the alleged negligent behavior caused the injury.

Damages

The damages in a malpractice case are in relation to the losses you sustained due to the negligence of a physician. These can include both actual financial losses, such as the costs of future medical treatment as well as non-economic losses such as pain and suffering.

To recover damages, you have to prove that the doctor did not fulfill the duty of care, that the physician's deviation from the norm caused injury, and that this injury had quantifiable monetary consequences. This is a complex legal analysis, which usually requires expert witness testimony.

Some of these losses are obvious for instance, if a doctor made an error that resulted in an infection or other medical problem and you required further treatment because of it. Other damages aren't as evident, for instance, if your doctor misdiagnoses you and you are not able to receive the right treatment.

If a medical professional's negligence leads to your death or death, you can file a lawsuit for the wrongful death. You can seek punitive damages in addition the compensation you'd get in a lawsuit for survival.

In many states, malpractice case there are limits on the amount you can recover in a malpractice case. These caps differ from state to state, and are typically applicable to both financial and other damages. Certain states have laws that limit the length of time you can wait before filing an action.

Time Limits

Like any lawsuit, there are specific deadlines to be adhered to or the case may be dismissed. Generally speaking, a malpractice lawyer lawsuit must be filed within two to six months of the medical malpractice lawyers that occurred. The time frame varies by state.

The time limit can be complicated, so it is vital to consult with an attorney immediately. The law firm will conduct an investigation to determine if there was a mistake and whether the case will stand up in the court. This process can take weeks or months.

Medical malpractice cases are subject to different laws and the statute of limitations is frequently altered. In Pennsylvania, a patient has two years from the date that they realized the error. This is referred to as the discovery rule.

In certain states the statutes of limitations begin to run from the date on which the medical error occurred. This is an issue if the medical mistake does not trigger any immediate symptoms. For example, suppose an unintentionally negligent doctor leaves an object that is foreign in the body after surgery. The patient might not find the object until three years after the surgery. In that situation the statute of limitation might have started to begin running from the date of the surgery, not from the discovery of the error.

Expert Witnesses

Many medical malpractice cases rely on expert witnesses to help explain the details of the case. An expert witness for a plaintiff will discuss the doctor's obligation of taking care of the patient as well as the standards of medical care in the area and the specialization for that type of physician with similar qualifications and expertise and the ways in which the defendant departed from those standards. The expert will also explain how the departure directly led to the patient's injury.

The defendant will engage a professional to counter the plaintiff's expert and malpractice case offer their professional opinion regarding whether the doctor met the standards of care. The experts could disagree, but the fact-finder decides which expert is most credible.

It is preferential for the expert to still be working in the medical field as they will have a better understanding of current practices. Judges and jurors are likely to consider professionals who are practicing more credible than experts who rely solely on court testimony.

It is also recommended to hire an expert who is specialized in the field of malpractice. For example a medical professional who is well versed in dealing with breast cancer can present a an argument that is more convincing about the reason for the plaintiff's injury. A medical malpractice attorney in Ocala knows which experts to talk to.