공지사항

Motor Vehicle Litigation

When a claim for liability is litigated in court, it becomes necessary to make a complaint. The defendant has the option to respond to the Complaint.

New York has a pure comparative negligence rule. This means that, in the event that a jury determines you to be responsible for an accident the damages you incur will be reduced based on your percentage of blame. There is one exception to this rule: CPLR SS 1602 excludes owners of vehicles rented or leased by minors.

Duty of Care

In a case of negligence the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care towards them. This duty is owed to all people, however those who operate a vehicle owe an even greater obligation to other drivers in their field. This includes not causing accidents in motor vehicles.

In courtrooms, the standard of care is established by comparing an individual's behavior to what a normal person would do in the same situations. In the case of medical malpractice, expert witnesses are usually required. People with superior knowledge in particular fields may be held to a higher standard of treatment.

A person's breach of their duty of care could cause harm to a victim or their property. The victim must demonstrate that the defendant did not fulfill their duty and caused the injury or damage they sustained. Causation is an essential element of any negligence claim. It requires proving both the primary and secondary causes of the injury and damages.

If someone runs the stop sign it is likely that they will be struck by another vehicle. If their vehicle is damaged, they'll be responsible for repairs. But the reason for the accident could be a cut or bricks, which later turn into a dangerous infection.

Breach of Duty

The second aspect of negligence is the breach of duty by a defendant. This must be proven in order to obtain compensation in a personal injury case. A breach of duty occurs when the at-fault party's actions fall short of what an average person would do in similar circumstances.

A doctor, for instance is a professional with a range of professional duties towards his patients that are derived from the law of the state and licensing bodies. Motorists owe a duty of care to other drivers and pedestrians on the road to drive safely and obey traffic laws. If a driver violates this obligation of care and results in an accident, the driver is responsible for the injuries sustained by the victim.

A lawyer can rely on the "reasonable person" standard to establish the existence of an obligation of care. The lawyer must then demonstrate that the defendant failed to comply with the standard in his actions. It is a matter of fact that the jury has to decide if the defendant met the standard or not.

The plaintiff must also establish that the defendant's breach of duty was the primary cause of the injuries. It is more difficult to prove this than a breach of duty. For instance an individual defendant could have crossed a red light, but his or her action wasn't the proximate cause of your bicycle crash. For this reason, causation is frequently disputed by defendants in collision cases.

Causation

In motor vehicle claim vehicle-related cases, the plaintiff must prove an causal link between breach of the defendant and their injuries. If the plaintiff suffered neck injuries in a rear-end accident and his or her attorney would argue that the collision was the reason for the injury. Other factors that are essential to produce the collision, such as being in a stationary car, are not culpable, and do not affect the jury's determination of the liability.

It is possible to prove a causal link between a negligent action and the plaintiff's psychological problems. The fact that the plaintiff has a an uneasy childhood, a bad relationship with his or her parents, experimented with alcohol and drugs or prior unemployment could have a influence on the severity the psychological problems he or suffers following an accident, but courts typically look at these factors as part of the circumstances that caused the accident in which the plaintiff resulted rather than an independent reason for the injuries.

It is imperative to consult an experienced lawyer when you've been involved in a serious car accident. Arnold & Clifford LLP attorneys have extensive experience representing clients in motor vehicle lawsuit vehicle accidents as well as business and commercial litigation, and personal injury cases. Our lawyers have built working relationships with independent physicians in a variety of areas of expertise as well as expert witnesses in computer simulations as well as reconstruction of accidents.

Damages

In motor vehicle settlement (Haibersut.com) vehicle litigation, a plaintiff could recover both economic and noneconomic damages. The first category of damages comprises any financial costs that are easily added up and calculated as a total, for example, medical treatment and lost wages, property repair and even future financial losses like a diminished earning capacity.

New York law also recognizes the right to seek non-economic damages like the suffering of others and the loss of enjoyment of life, which cannot be reduced to a dollar amount. The proof of these damages is through extensive evidence such as depositions from family members and friends of the plaintiff medical records, depositions, or other expert witness testimony.

In the event of multiple defendants, Motor Vehicle Settlement courts will typically employ comparative fault rules to determine the amount of damages that should be divided between them. The jury must determine the degree of fault each defendant had for the accident and to then divide the total amount of damages by the percentage of the fault. New York law however, does not permit this. 1602 specifically exempts owners of vehicles from the comparative fault rule in relation to injuries sustained by drivers of these trucks and cars. The process to determine if the presumption is permissive or not is complex. Typically it is only a clear evidence that the owner refused permission to the driver to operate the vehicle can overcome the presumption.